基于CiteSpace的环境规制与碳减排研究现状分析
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

基金项目:


Analysis of the Current Status of CiteSpace-based Research on Environmental Regulation and Carbon Emission Reduction
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
    摘要:

    通过不同研究视角梳理环境规制与碳减排的国内外文献发表现状,结合国内外研究趋势和前沿动态,提出针对性的改进措施和建议,以促进国内环境规制与碳减排领域研究水平的提升和进步。基于文献计量学方法,针对环境规制与碳减排主题,利用CiteSpace软件对Web of Science(WoS)核心集收录的822篇文献英文文献和中文社会科学引文索引(CSSCI)核心期刊中的4 768篇中文文献进行了比较和分析。国内在环境规制与碳减排研究上虽起步晚,但国际认可度逐年上升。与国外研究相比,国内在能源消费、FDI、绩效等方面的研究较少。从模型方法上来讲国内较少利用数据包络分析(DEA)方法进行研究。文献计量法得出的结论偏重概率规律,可减少作者主观选择问题。国外的数据库由于精确限制,相关文献量较少,分析不全面;国内CSSCI导出的数据无法进行引文及期刊来源分析,分析广度有限。

    Abstract:

    Through different research perspectives, the current situation of domestic and international literature publication on environmental regulation and carbon emission reduction was sorted out, and targeted improvement measures and suggestions are put forward in combination with domestic and international research trends and cutting-edge dynamics, so as to promote the enhancement and advancement of the research level of the field of environmental regulation and carbon emission reduction in China. Based on the bibliometric method, 822 English documents included in the core set of Web of Science (WoS) and 4 768 Chinese documents in the core journals of CSSCI were compared and analyzed by CiteSpace software for the theme of environmental regulation and carbon emission reduction. Domestic research on environmental regulation and carbon emission reduction started late, but the international recognition is increasing year by year. Compared with foreign studies, there are fewer domestic studies on energy consumption, FDI and performance. In terms of modeling methodology, fewer domestic studies utilize the data envelopment analysis (DEA) method. The conclusions drawn from bibliometric methods favor probability laws, which can reduce the problem of subjective selection by authors. Foreign databases have less relevant literature due to precise limitations, and the analysis is not comprehensive. The data exported from domestic CSSCI cannot be analyzed for citations and journal sources, and the breadth of analysis is limited.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

庞帅奇.基于CiteSpace的环境规制与碳减排研究现状分析[J].科技与产业,2025,25(02):107-112

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2025-02-18
×
《科技和产业》
喜报 | 学会期刊《科技和产业》成为国家哲学社会科学文献中心2024年度最受欢迎的经济学期刊