泸定地震后公路应急抢险响应及灾损评估方法
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

基金项目:


Highway Emergency Rescue Response and Disaster Damage Assessment Method after Luding Earthquake
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
    摘要:

    为支撑公路抢险区应急决策,从人员组成、工作流程和仪器设备3方面建立公路抢险区次生灾害应急响应技术流程。针对工作流程建立12 h快速辨识灾损阶段、24 h快速评估风险阶段、36 h定量评估风险阶段实施步骤,并以2022年9月5日泸定强震后公路抢险为典型案例,采用上述流程进行灾情评估。结果表明,该方法在泸定海螺沟某隧道口滑坡道路损毁点A和B长度由多幅影像平均计算可知为181.31 m、115.26 m,宽度均为9.81 m,体积分别为4.7×104 m3、2.6×104 m3;2号滑坡抢险中长度误差7%,宽度误差4%,体积误差10%。

    Abstract:

    To support the emergency decision-making of highway emergency rescue area, the technical process of emergency response to secondary disasters in highway emergency rescue area was established from three aspects, including personnel composition, work flow and equipment. According to the workflow, the implementation steps of 12 h rapid identification of disaster damage stage, 24 h rapid assessment of risk stage and 36 h quantitative assessment of risk stage wae established. Taking the highway rescue after the strong earthquake in Luding on September 5 in 2022 as a typical case, the above process was used to evaluate the disaster situation. The results show that the length of road damage points A and B of landslide at a tunnel entrance in Luding Hailuogou is 181.31 m and 115.26 m respectively, and the width is 9.81 m, and the volume is 4.7 × 104 m3 and 2.6 × 104 m3 respectively. In the rescue of 2# landslide, the length error is 7 %, the width error is 4 %, and the volume error is 10 %.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

金鹏,钟焱宇,梅本强,张乐,何云勇.泸定地震后公路应急抢险响应及灾损评估方法[J].科技与产业,2025,25(02):79-84

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2025-02-18
×
《科技和产业》
喜报 | 学会期刊《科技和产业》成为国家哲学社会科学文献中心2024年度最受欢迎的经济学期刊