双侧壁导坑法隧道施工方案优化研究
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

基金项目:


Study on Optimization of Tunnel Construction Scheme with Double Side Heading Method
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
    摘要:

    以武汉某排水通道工程为工程背景,运用有限元分析软件Plaxis3D,对双侧壁导坑法隧道的施工过程开展数值模拟,重点分析不同循环开挖进尺、不同工序对隧道开挖过程中的变形响应及地表变形规律,优化双侧壁导坑法隧道施工方案。计算结果表明:循环进尺为4 m时计算得到的地表沉降值及拱顶沉降值显著大于循环进尺为1 m和2 m时的对应值。施工顺序1(Ⅰ→Ⅱ→Ⅲ→Ⅳ→Ⅴ→Ⅵ)较施工顺序2(Ⅰ→Ⅲ→Ⅱ→Ⅳ→Ⅴ→Ⅵ)对地层扰动影响更小。对比计算结果,综合考虑施工安全及施工效率的因素,建议隧道的循环进尺取2 m,施工工序采用顺序1(Ⅰ→Ⅱ→Ⅲ→Ⅳ→Ⅴ→Ⅵ)。该研究可为武汉地区相似地层环境条件下的暗挖隧道工程提供设计参考。

    Abstract:

    Taking the drainage channel project of Wuhan as research object, the finite element analysis software PLAXIS is used to carry out numerical simulation of the construction process of double-wall tunnel. The deformation response and surface deformation law of different circular excavation footages and different excavation order are emphatically analyzed, and the construction scheme of double side heading method tunnel is optimized. The results show that the surface settlement and vault settlement calculated by the cyclic footage of 4 m are significantly greater than those calculated by the cyclic footage of 1 m and 2 m. The excavation order 1 ( I → II → III → IV → V → VI ) has less influence on ground disturbance than excavation order 2 ( I → III → II → IV → V → VI ). Compared with the calculation results, considering the factors of construction safety and construction efficiency, it is suggested that the circular footage of the tunnel should be 2 m and the excavation order should be selected in 1 ( I → II → III → IV → V → VI ). The study could provide design references for underground tunneling engineering under similar stratum conditions in Wuhan area.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

王润钰,卢渊.双侧壁导坑法隧道施工方案优化研究[J].科技与产业,2022,22(05):368-374

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2022-05-22
×
《科技和产业》
喜报 | 学会期刊《科技和产业》成为国家哲学社会科学文献中心2024年度最受欢迎的经济学期刊